Old Javanese texts republished by Muslim courts in the 18th century: Bernard Arps

On the second day of the farewell seminar celebrating the coming of retirement age of Willem van der Molen at KITLV/Leiden University, Ben Arps gave a fascinating talk on Islam at the court of Surakarta in the 1780s. Several classical works of the older Javanese period (Ramayana, Bharatayudha, Arjunawiwaha, Bima's search for knowledge with Dewa Ruci) were re-written in an Islamic atmosphere. Arps calls this a renaissance of Old Javanese culture, but in a positive Islamic style. There must have been some kind of double loyalty: both to Javanese culture and its heritage and to the Islamic background, confession and faith of the authors at the courts. This reminded me of the pious Catholic priest who taught me Latin and Greek in the gymnasium, the secondary school of my youth. He gave us texts from many classical authors. We, his students of the age of 15-16, once asked him to give us a text of the Greek New Testament. He look surprised and said: 'The New Testament is in simple, but bad Greek, you better learn good Greek first!' I told this several times to my students at the IAIN, the Islamic State University in Jakarta and Yogyakarta. They were surprised: as if someone would say that the Qur'an is in bad Arabic and that you should learn the Kitab al-Aghani first before the Qur'an!  But for Western Catholics Homer, Plato and Xenophon represent a high culture, at the same level as the Jewish-Christian one.

From the same period of the later 1780s, but in this case from Yogyakarta, Arps also gave a strange theory about Aji Saka. Here Aji Saka was described as number five of the companions of the prophet Muhammad. After Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and Ali, he was sent on a long journey to India, Sri Lanka and finally to Java, where he brought the right religion. So: Islamization of Java directly by order of the Prophet Muhammad! As once also was stated by Buya Hamka, that Islam came from Arabia during the lifetime of the Prophet and the Sahabat. This only was possible for Aji Saka with the help of the great prophet of the seas and oceans, Nabi Khidr.

Willem van der Molen was not too active in these quite fantastic speculations and interpretations. I suggested that in the present quest for an interpretation of local Indonesian Islam as Islam Nusantara, the revival of Javanese texts could be very interesting. Therefore it would also be becessary not only to look to the great kakawin but also to the texts of Suluk which were once also studied at the Yogyakarta IAIn under Pak Simuh. But Van der Molen  remained quite realistic and sober about the possibility to develop a centre of Javanese studies in Europe of even Leiden, but mentioned his own website with his latest project, the diary of a Chinese-Javanese citizen of Yogyakarta in the middle of the 19th century, who followed the 'Javanese love of writing texts of great length' and composed some 700 pages about his family, his work in selling opium, lending money, talking to Dutch, some Chinese and most of all Javanese people. Look at http://willemvandermolen.nl/blog.


Just a last picture. Anbiya, or stories of the prophets, are very popular in Java: Amin Soedoro used to say that Javanese know no boundary to their fantasy and as to the prophets they have contributed an umlimited number of miracles. Images are also no exception. See below!

A farewell to Javanese studies? Willem van der Molen and more?

More than 95 million people speak Javanese as a child, at home, with friends and family, but very little receive further education in the complicated language of the largest ethnic group of Indonesia. The enormous success of Indonesian as official language since 1945 has brought a drastic decline in the use of Javanese. Therefore there is a threat that Javanese will die as a cultivated language! This was one of the themes at the farewell conference at KITLV, Leiden, 12 and 13 December this year, at the occasion of the official retirement of Willem van der Molen (postponed one year because last year he was involved in a programme of studies on Panji stories at the Hebrew University of Tel Aviv).
Tony Day opened the series with the beginning of Javanese classical writings: why was translation, prakrit, or vernacularisation so important (because so much of what has been rescued from Old Javanese writings is translation or adaptation of Sanskrit texts). He was (among various otther scholars) followed by Gregory Quinn, who commented about the end: Ronggowarsito as 'the seal, not of the prophets but of Javanese literature'! He mentioned four reasons for the decline of Javanese in general: 1) Loss of the aristocratic authority (the courts of Yogya and Solo no longer have active pujangga kraton); 2) there is a loss of ability to read Javanese script. As an example he gave the emphasis in primary schools on the mystical meaning of the letters, without training to use it as an effective alfabet; 3) loss of official status: in state documents, in the bureaucracy; 4) decline of ability to speak and write high Javanese.

 

But Quinn also had some good news. He met several groups who were writing stories and poetry , published magazines, series of books, partly as hybrid publishing (initially paid by the authors themselves, only after success the authors earned some money). There are websites. There is even a Wikipedia in Javanese with more than 57.000 articles: https://jv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tepas.

The peaceful heart of Yunan Yusuf

Two years ago I received a book by Yunan Yusuf, of the Jakarta UIN, Islamic State University. It was his commentary on Qur'an Juz 24. Last October he donated me his next volume: on Juz 23. Only know I have started reading this new volume.
First, I was surprised to see how easily he writes. While in Australia he could write a volume of 600 pages in three months! It is all very pleasant reading. Not too much technicalities and very informative about the text of the Qur'an according to his vision of its meaning.
I saw now more clearly, that he considers the Qur'an as not (only) the collection of the 114 surahs but first of all for his commentary the collection of 30 juz. He even created a new name for this section. Not only the first Arab words wa ma lîy, but a more meaningful and poetic label: Qalbun salim, The words occur twice in the Qur'an, first in this juz, in sura 37:84 about Abraham who turned to God 'with a peaceful heart'.  Only once it is mentioned again in the Qur'an, in 26:89 when it is said that people who stand for God at the last judgment with a 'peaceful heart' (Qalbun salim) will be allowed to stay in paradise.
It was quite surprising for me to see even a distinct and new title for a somewhat fortuitous section of the Qur'an: it is a help to read the text in the thirty days of Ramadan. The basic division of the Qur'an is a sura, a distinct literary entity and the basis for good interpretation.

Above: the new volume by Prof. Yunan Yusuf and below (right) Yunan donating the book to me, last October in Ciputat.
Yunan himself also realised that the true division of the Qur'an is not according to juz but to sura, because the commentary starts not with verse 22 of sura 36 (where the juz begins), but with the  story from verse 13 of the sura YASIN itself. After the beginning verses (of course the praise of the Qur'an because of the mysetirous letters), from verse 13 on there is a story about a town or even city of unbelievers, where two messengers were sent, still followed by a third person. In traditional commentaries it is the city of the pagan Seleucid kingdom of Antiocheia. Sadok and his offspring were the high priest of Israel, from the time of David and Salomon until the Makkabee period. Therefore perhaps the two messengers to the town of Antiocheia were given the names of Sadiq, Saduq and Shalom.
Als in the Christian period Antioch was an important town: the first Christians got their name of 'Christian' here.
I am curious to see whether Yunan also explains why sura 36, Ya Sin, is so often recited in favour of the dead. Muhammadiyah people like he is himself, will not do this, but still it is a common ritual!

Another book about Fethullah Gülen, with some Indonesian contacts

In my study room I have one special Gülen shelf: about 50 books by and about Fethullah Gülen. Much about Turkey, but also about the global impact of the Hizmet movement. In 2015 I was together with Gürkan Celik the editor of the book on Gülen-Inspired Hizmet in Europe. The Western Journey of a Turkish Muslim Movement. It was interesting to work on it. I never saw a review, nor was there a mention about sold copies (published by Peter Lang in Bruxelles). Anyway, it was done amidst nice contacts with remarkable and sincere members of Hizmet.
A 'post- June 2016 coup' book was recently published by the New Delhi Professor Anwar Ahmad. He was teaching in Delhi the history of Islam in West Asia, came to Turkey fort a short Gülen-visit in 2008 (Fatih University, Newspaper Zaman, high schools, Kimse Yok Mu, the charity, and the Journalists and Writers Organization). He was in 2011 for some time teaching at Fatih University in Istanbul. Between September 2013 and June 2016 he was teaching in Gaziantep (Southeast Turkey, close to the Syrian border) and left in time before the coup.

 Anwar Alam is more reflective than informative. Only in few respects he gives new information, but he is fascinating in his comparison of Gülen with the Ihkwan, the Jamaat-i-Islami of Pakistan, the Tablighi  Jamaat of India (however nothing about NU of Muhammadiyah of Indonesia).
He once attended a meeting of sponsors, fundraising, himmet, where US$ 32.000 was collected for a secondary school in Indonesia (enough for one year) and promises given for 1000 scholarships for Indonesians to stay one year in Turkey (p. 154).
The book apparently was started before 2016, when there were already problems but no straight persecution of the movement. His analysis of the hatred by Erdogan and AKP versus Gülen and Hizmet is described in pp. 227-8: "Thus, historically speaking, the political tradition in Middle Eastern countries including Turkey has been hostile to autonomous religious groups, as the state in the Midle East - whether secular or Islamist - suspects the political allegiance of various Islamic groups. The Middle Eastern states - whether secular, secular, or Islamist - to a large extent rely on Islam as the most important source of legitimacy of their rule, which makes to wish them not only to control and monopolize all 'Islamic spaces' but also leaves them deeply suspicious of autonomous visible Islamic political and social organizations or groups, as the latter are perceived as potential or social forces to challenge the legitimacy of the regimes. ...  The Ikhwan al Muslimin in Egypt has been the object of state repression in various degrees throughout the modern political history of Egypt since the Nasserite regime on the charge of being a 'parallel state' or 'state within the state'. "
This week the new minister of religion of Indonesia Fachrul Razi announced that the permit (as an organization) for Front Pembela Islam will be renewed: of you cannot ban or crush them, join or embrace them! That was also the practice of the Catholic Church if new religious orders or dubious places of pilgrimage could not be forbidden, because they were too popular. They should be formally included in the big system or crushed down. The latter has happened with Gülen in Turkey.
On the whole it is a book full with long and complicated sentences, not so easy to read. Here and there still some new facts, but interesting analysis as well.

Suluk Wragul 'The Otter'

I am preparing a lecture summarizing the teaching work I did in Indonesia in the 1980s, in Jakarta and Yogyakarta. One aspect was, in the Yogyakarta period, the project of research about suluk religious poetry in Javanese. There is a small booklet of ten poems, published by the staff of the project. The first is Suluk Wragul, with a number of animals. The leading figure is despised by the others, like in Suluk Abesi the 'nigger' also here the hero, although initially despised by the others, finally gives the basic truth to the others. The black monkey hates the otter because he is only involved in seeking food. The religious leader or penghulu and the wayang players are seen as ideal, and praised.

 But the otter also criticises the religious functionaries (who are often criticised in suluk poetry): this man only seeks money by selling his knowledge of mantras, religious formulas. And also the hermits have hidden motivations of richness and power. In stanza 20 the monkeys are threatened that the 'Lord of the river' may come to punish them and they disappear. A cuckoo  comes and some kind of heron, finally also a crow (stanza 26). But the poem does not change to a syair burung, a debate of birds, like the ones written in Malay by Raja Ali Haji in the period 1850-1870 in Penyengat.In stanza 27 a dalang enters the poem as someone who could be able to explain the object of religious veneration. Arjuna is mentioned in stanza 30 as someone who may be able to explain the threefold question: who is venerated, how can we see who is venerated, and finally how can we enter the presence of who is venerated? It is suggested that the dalang, who is sitting behind the screen may explain us about the truth of the relation between the servant and the divinity.
Many aspects of Islam are mentioned here in passing: from amulets to formal prayer, often in a critical way: in stanza 24 even the kalimat tauhid or the confession of faith is said to been made divine in such a way that it prevents the believer from reaching truly to God! - But I am also aware that my source is the free Indonesian rendering by Emha Ainun Nadjib, so there should be more comparison with the suluk literature in general. And here the problem remains that so little research had been done to this genre, although there is a great amount of poems in the greater collections.

Suluk Abesi

Mrs Himemoto Yumiko was for a long time the official for Indonesia of the Toyota Foundation. She asked me probably in 1985 for a proposal from the IAIN, to be sponsored by her organization. In Yogyakarta from IAIN staff there was the proposal for a study of Suluk literature. Some scholars have deducted the typical Javanese Suluk poetry as influenced by the mystical suluk, popular in the Naqshbandi brotherhood, as a period of fasting and praying, practised in seclusion during forty days. More generally accepted is the theory, that the word suluk does not originate from the Arabic salaka or mystical travel, but from the Sanskrit shloka, the chief metre used in the epic poetry of India. Whatever may have been its origins, this great corpus of Islamic poetry in Javanese, created during the sixteenth until the nineteenth century, experienced a lack of interest in the last century when Malay and later Indonesian became the most important la­nguage. This poetry was `too Islamic' for the few experts in older Javanese literature. So it was neglected by most. It was also seen as  `too  Javanese' for Muslim scholars. So, with the help of the Japanese dollars a project could start in Yogyakarta.

                Because very little was published, the project took a Leiden Manuscript, LOr 7375. Its Javanese script was put in Latin script on the computer and translated by a small team. The ten poems were translated into Indonesian. Then this was dipuitisasikan or put in poetic Indonesian by the well known poet Emha Ainun Najib.

                One of these is the poem Suluk Abesi. It has the riddles of the Abyssinian faqir, a poor black man, who was insulted by a penghulu or qadi of Java, because he had entered a mosque: “You should not sit in front of me, because I never will give my instruction to common people like you...” Thereupon the Abyssinian planned to obey and only wanted to inquire after a few things: “ Where is the shore of the wide ocean? Where is the tablet without any scrip­ture? The Lotus flower outside any pond?.. A lamp without a wick, a green leave without a twig, a mu'azzin without a drum?” The answer to the riddles is always the same: “An ocean without a coast is nothing else then Allah: every being will vanish and merge, be lost in God's essence, the Zatullah...  The lotus flower, that blossoms forever, without standing in a pond, that is the Ruh Idafi. The Most Highest exists without a location ... The lamp, burning without a wick, reflects Allah, existing by Himself: He eradiates out of Himself, without oil, there is no source for his shine. He gleams continuously and illuminates this world. So it is. Everything is God.”

                The last verse of the poem formulates the basic democratic value of the religious education. The wise man shows that there is no social hierarchy valid in the face of God: “And you, my Excellency, you became a penghulu, not by yourself; also the King has no final power: only Allah is the true King, who appointed you to become a qadi. When you leads the prayer, followed by the congregation, it is not you who performs the salat. If you would think so, your prayer would be fraudulent.”

                Kejawen means literally ‘something Javanese’. But it is often used in contrast to pure Islamic belief. Then it has the connotation of ‘Javanese folklore, deviating from pure Islam’. In the mood of a more proud and self-respecting Indonesian Islamic identity or the culture of Islam Nusantara, this word Kejawen perhaps will experience an update. Then it can be the label for a self-respecting distinct Islamic culture.

---

'Nobody is immortal except Wiranto...'

Yesterday KITLV in Leiden had an interesting, although overloaden seminar with three speakers: each given 15 minutes only. Instead of the usual 20 people on Thurday afternoon, there were more than fifty now, including the Indonesian ambassador, Pak Puja. Theme was Indonesia's Political Economy update..

Philips Vermonte in the rather dark, narrow conference room of KITLV in Leiden
First was Philips Vermonte, from the USA but working at CSIS in Jakarta (no longer ruled by Ali Murtopo and friends, now a liberal research centre). He put comments on the fair elections and the weak, often quite undemocratic political parties as the weakest element in Indonesia democracy. Notwithstanding the success of Jokowi, there are quite many 'oligarchs' in Indonesian politics. 'Nearly the same bosses as before Reformasi. In 1998 it were, next to Suharto, Prabowo, Wiranto, Akbar Tanjung, Amien Rais and they still are leading parties, that lack internal democratic procedures.' So he had the joke, that 'Nobody is immortal except Wiranto'. His title was 'Consolidating a fledgling democracy'. He doubted whether proposals like a possible third term for a president and a return to indirect presidential elections would give new inspiration to democracy. This would lead instead to what he called a 'minimal democracy'. He also was sometimes optimistic: in 2017 there were 171 local elections. Only in Jakarta there was the tumult about Ahok, but most other elections went smoothly, also in places where Muslim parties supported non-Muslim candidates, like one Nurdin Abdullah in South Sulawesi. Besides an increase in religious concern (but decline of openly Muslim  parties!) he noticed a favour for technocrats as well.

Two other speakers were Arief Yusuf (Bandung, Padjadjaran Univ., here in the centre) and Rizal Shidiq, right, now in Lweiden University), who had many statistic material on the increase of religious intolerance. In 2007 and 2014 some 30.000 people were interviewed with similar questions like whether they would tolerate non-Muslim neighbours, a non-Muslim governor, partner for their children. Apparently people qualifying themselves as deeper/more religious were also more intolerant. Where there were greater differences in income, there was also greater intolerance. Primary or secondary education had not much influence on intolerance, only people with tertiary education were more tolerant. Is Islam special intolerant?
There was not much about history. I see myself two developments: since the 1970s the great expansion of primary education went hand in hand with an increase in religious classes obligatory for all pupils. These classes were and are given by very strict teachers, who follow overt Muslim doctrines. They must have given a great stimulus to the decline of abangan spirituality. After 2000 there is a quick spread of religious interference in what was before rather 'secular'. It started with the marriage law of 1974, followed by a steady process of a ban on interreligious marriage, but then after 2000 with more and more rules about halal food, about Islamic banking, dress codes, halal tourism. Moderation of religion could be good too if it only would mean that the impact of specific religious rules for many secular fields could be reduced.

Debate about the new Minister of Religion, Fachrul Razi

Between 13-20 October, while we were in Yogyakarta, there were all kind of speculations about the new cabinet of Jokowi II. There was in the local newspaper of Yogyaarta a curious interview with UIN Rector Prof. Yulian Wahyudi, who was nominated a candidate by the 'Forum Rektor PTKIN" , the Council of Presidents of Islamic Universities of Indonesia, to become the new minister of religion.

 In the interview Yudian Wahyudi communicated  some plans about what to do if he would be nominated to the position. The most important issue was that he wanted to start a procedure of 'preaching permits': all imams only should be allowed to give Friday sermons if they had passed some kind of examination, guaranteeing that they would not spread radical ideas. This licence would become one of the first measures against the ongoing lack of flexibility and tolerance among Muslim clerics and the increase of hardliners.
Wahyudi was not nominated for the position, and he also did not receive a position as minister of education and research, his other choice. But the retired army general Fachrul Razi, 72 years, without special religious qualifications, took over the idea of issuing special certificates for Friday preachers. In one of his first interviews he protested against to much hate talk against people taken for non-Muslim or bad Muslim in mosque preaching and he threatened that he would be serious in banning this kind of people from the pulpits.

The Nahdlatul Ulama had to be happy with the position of Vice-President, given to its leader Amin Ma'ruf  'worth like five ministers',  and not complain about a Minister of Religion of quite different background this time! Fachrul Razi also had some soothening words: a beard and 'short' trousers (above the ankle or celana cangkring) is not automatically a proof of being a dangerous radical Muslim. In his first week of office, it was the 'Day of the Santri' for all Indonesia, but in the true santri-land of East Java the new minister was not invited for the great ceremonies. For this moment, it is a long list of aspect of a heated debate about 'who is radical?' and 'how can radicalism and hate speech be stopped?'

The Mataram of Tony Reid, Javanese and Muslim

Anthony Reid wrote a surprising Novel of Love, Faith and Power in Early Java (UK, Monsoon). Tony Reid presents here in historic fiction the story of one Thomas Hodges, who is left in Banten by a single British vessel, because he wants to travel to Mataram. In Banten the story concentrates on the rivalry of the Portuguese and Dutch, seeking good prices for pepper,  whereas the British presence was too incertain and small, compared to the two other nations. After going by a Chinese boat to Japara, together with a Javanese young lady, Hodges is taken prisoner by soldiers from Demak while trying to reach Mataram. He has to embrace Islam in order not te be killed. After many adventures he reaches Mataram, where his special knowledge about weapons gives him a privileged position. He was already married to Sri, the Javanese young lady who was his interpreter for Javanese but also instructor for many of its cultural difficult problems.

While his position in Mataram becomes more promising, Hodges makes much problems with his religious identity: he remains a quite orthodox member of the Anglican Church, detesting the Portuguese 'papists' but also the religious indifference of the Dutch.
A special problem for him is that Javanese culture has about the same ideological status as Islam. On p. 266 Hodges asks: 'Most countries have only one faith, and barely tolerate others. Why did Java have two?' A wise Javanese cleric answers: 'Since ancient times we Javanese have understood that the universe requires balance. There are male and female, heavens and earth, mountain and ocean ..' I combined this with the sentence by the former Minister of Religion, Lukman Hakim Saifuddin: 'God created everything in pairs..' Strict and full Islam always has had a cultural counterpart in Java, even in most of Indonesia, either called 'mystic synthesis', adat, Pancasila, or aliran kepercayaan. Hodges also wanted to add Christianity as another option, besides the other two and calling it trimurti.
This picture is too short, but just it is written in admiration for what Reid has written about the contemporary, modern schism in Indonesia with its Salafi intolerance.
There is much more in this book, as a historic novel. We see the questions of Robert de Nobili in India, Ricci in China, of Susaku Endo about the Kirishitan in Japan, now applied to Java. Fascinating.

Iranians at UIN Yogyakarta: readers of sacred texts creating meaning

Friday 18 October I participated in a rather exceptional seminar in Yogyakarta: a meeting on Scripture and its readers: theory of hermeneutics. A mollah and professor from Teheran (Dr. Mohammed HosseinMokhtari, a Ph.D. in Durham, Chancellor University of Islamic Denominations) with two female academic colleagues gave the lectures in the morning.

Mokhtari gave a lecture where the philosophy of Gadamer was leading: different understandings of a text are natural because the meaning comes from a fusion between reader and text. I asked  him whether he knew Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd and he smile understandably. He had been already in Yogyakarta before and was apparently on good terms with organiser Shafaatun al-Mirzana. Some quotes: 'We have not the duty to discover the meaning of the text, but to give meaning to the text. The text is a dead phenomenon. We must give new life to the text through meaning.'
Mokhtari was followed by a lady from Iran, Jamila Alamanhuda, who spoke in Persian, which was sentence after sentence translated into English. She based her talk on Molla Sadra, a philosopher who was very important for Khomeiny as well as for Ali Shariati and Tabataba'i. Christians and Muslims are part of the Millet Ibrahim.We all want to surrender to God. Why then are only 'Muslims' called Muslims and not Christians as well? This reminded me of Nurcholis Madjid about Muslim with and without a capital letter.

The other Iranian lady (Prof. Rayhan Sadat) was not so liberal as Jamila. She only complained that the present generation was not so piousandobedient as the first generation, the sahabat.

There was more remarkable this day. Dr. Daniel Listijabudi of the Protestant Duta Wacana University gave a nice report from an experiment where Protestant and Muslims read texts form the other religion and gave interpretation. That was not the philosophical argument on hermeneutics, but a concrete experience. Dr. Sahiron Syamsuddin gave a fiery talk about the debate on Ahok's use of the word wilayah that had brought  him for two years in prison. My talk on Surat  Maryam will be put in Academia.edu. Shafaatun herself gave lively recordings of her cross-religion reading of scripture. A book was ready with all the papers: Kitab Suci dan para pembacanya, with many papers in English too. Thank you Syafa for organizing this!

Indonesianists in Indonesia

After the ceremony of the Anugerah Budaya in Senayan, 9-10 October, Paule and I visited our old friends in Ciputat (like we most of them retired, some very weak and sick) and took a wonderful train to Yogyakarta. Much space in the luxury section of the train. Landscape was somewhat dry. We seem to be in the longest dry period since memoryever: 176 days without rain in Yogyakarta, which is similar to nearly six months. But still we could see all phases of rice cultivation: from ploughing to planting and growing till harvesting.

 In Yogyakarta we stayed in Hotel Novotel, nicely located for the big universities. The first day we started already with a seminar for 'Indonesianists', organized by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. In order to enhance the international ranking of Indonesian education they invited students from abroad to study for several years in Indonesia. We talked to 4 female students who studied Indonesian at Universitas Wahid Hasyim in Semarang, but also seveal from Jemen who were busy with Civil Engineering. Some from Tanzania, Nepal, quite many from Malaysia: as if the great Soekarno-dream of solidarity of Asia-Africa had come to reality! They were happy with their scholarships and also with the invitation to gather in Yogyakarta at UGM for this meeting.
They received talks from much older people who had been trained more in a true Indonesianist style. Azyumardi Azra was here to talk about moderate Islam. He did not look healthy, needed a wheel chair in the airport, because he could not walk the great distances. He stressed that Indonesia has a culture of accomodation (bisa diatur) and does not like too strict and dogmatic religious rules. 'Life is more relaxed than in other Muslim majority countries.' A little bit propaganda for moderate Indonesia!
Very moving was the talk by Dr. Siti Ruhaini Dzuhayatin, a former student of mine at the Yogyakarta IAIN and now advisor to the President for (inter-)religious affairs. She saw the last few years a strong movement towards stricter Islamisation and separation of the religious groups. Something like the communalism of India. There is much attention for busana Muslim. In December 2016 (during the protests against Ahok) FPI entered also her kampung in Yogyakarta. There was much propagation for hard and separatist viewpoint through Whatsapp for hidup Islami. How nice it is when all people go to the same mosque, when everybody is nicely dressed and live according to shariah. (Elga Sarapung told that she saw a 'Pompa Bensin Syar'i' and thought whether fuel for cars should be halal as well). Siti Ruhaini also told that the WA group held a debate about the rule that men should not shake hands of women at the celebration of the end of Ramadan! She was very angry about this development.
Philip Buckley from McGill was here as well, making a detour from a China trip. Max Lane gave an impressive talk promoting the writings of Pramoedya Ananta Toer. Dr. Reevany Bustami from Malaysia gave a talk about the spirit of Nusantara, trying to combine Indonesian and Malaysian identity. I talked about 'Magic Realism or when pujangga write history', combining the spiritual world and fantasy of the writers of babad with Ayu Utami (the paper will be put n Academia.edu).
A very interesting lady talked about ACMI: Aku Cinta Makanan Indonesia.

 The students were entertained with grand performances of gamelan music and dances. At the opening evening with a mixed group of Indonesian and foreign players. The  second eveningwas for Wayang Wong, Ramayana story of Hanuman discovering the place where Sinta was taken as prisoner by Ravana. Fantastic!  Thank you Deplu for this.
Talking about pluralism: in our hotel Novotel in Yogyakarta the bartender was dressed in Bavarian style, supporting the Oktoberfest, and its beer. Expensive here as well!

Too much religion in Indonesia?

Some 25 years ago Romo Mangunwijaya already stated that for Pancasila he found the democratic and social pillars more important than the  religious one on the almighty one Lordship. And he judged that there was 'too much religion in Indonesia'. In the latest issue of Basis  (no 9-10, 2019, p. 3) there is an angry statement in the usual introductory essay 'signs of our time' (tanda tanda zaman). The Jesuit Benedictus Hari Juliawan regrets 'that the obsession with religion recently has shown the tendency to reduce the forming of a character to the memorization sacred scripture. Often the starting point is that religion brings us the infallible law of God. Therefore anything written in the holy book cannot be questioned by anybody, including science.' (Major theme of the issue is on the value of science).

This same week I received from Elga Sarapung the PDF copy of the 'testament' of the leaving minister of religion Lukman Hakim Saifuddin. It is a book with the title Moderasi Keagamaan. There is something wrong with religion in the country where I am still staying (this week for three seminars in Yogyakarta!) Religion must be moderate! Not dominant, not extreme! The book does not say that we should moderate religion, like we must moderate food, or work. But still, there seems to be too much religion. A virtue is the good thing in the middle of two bad qualities: not only in the philosophy of Aristotle, also in Muslim and Christian reworking of his ethics. So, between ultra-conservative and extreme liberal, the moderate is the right middle way. In fact, however, Saifuddin is afraid of violence, verbal and physical. And he is afraid of intolerance, of exclusivism, of people who want to live in a strict homogeneous society, with all people thinking in the same way. This is all put in the idea of Moderasi. It takes some time to understand all dimensions of this word that has become quite popular also as wasatiya, the 'middle way',  as earlier this year pleaded by the NU in Nijmegen (se the blog of 21 june 2019).

In a book of some 160 pages many aspects are described, but I missed a clear and open reference to what has been described in the book of 2009 (Ilusi Negara Islam) as the 'infiltration of Salafi Islam from Arab countries'. What Madinier and Van Bruinessen describe as the 'end of innocence' and 'the conservative turn' is here indicated more vaguely. It is written by someone from the bureaucracy.
An Indonesian Minister of Religion cannot only speak about Islam (although most of the book is about Islam), he also must not be too clear about his enemies. The nicest sections are with the concrete stories. Like the man who bought a house in a village in Bantul, but was rejected first as a newcomer because he was Christian and by written decision of the village chief the village should be 100% Muslim. One reason for ths was that some 30 elders in the village did not like to see a dead non-Muslim among deceased Muslims on the common and public graveyard. The bupati of Bantul interfered and the new family is now living happily in the village. (71-3)
The book is a celebration of pluriformity: God has created everything in pairs (55). It gives concrete stories of what happens in the country and what kind of measures are taken by the ministry to promoty religious harmony. I wonder whether the small groups of hardliners will be convinced by this nice work, but promotors will be strengthened in their conviction and receive support.
There is also a book by Quraysh Shihab on this theme. I must buy that here as well.